ok, i need your input! i've been shooting in both raw and jpg (two different formats - jpg is when the camera does the processing for you and raw is when i do the processing) and, well, i'm wondering which YOU think is better! i like the raw better but, since i have to process EACH photo - and if i take 100 pictures, well, that is a lot of work. so, i'm wondering if the product is worth the work! especially when the jpg is just fine (for the most part).
so, here are the three pictures below (in NO particular order). one is just the raw image that i processed myself. one is the jpg image, straight from the camera (no editing), and the other is the jpg opened in adobe elements and "autocorrected." you can click on the image to make it larger (if maybe you want to check for details).
so, if you would please take the time and tell me which of these three images looks the best. (if you're feeling particularly chatty, maybe you could tell me why you picked that photo over the other 2!)
if you are an anonymous reader, please just post an anonymous comment! there is no way of me tracking back to where or who you are. i just really want input here! :)